Conference USA NCAA

NCAAF Sagarin – NCAAF Football



All Contents Copyright � 2004 Jeff Sagarintm. All rights reserved.

COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2003 Ratings thru results of SUNDAY, JANUARY 4, 2004 – FINAL
RATING&nbspand PREDICTOR&nbspare unbiased and so is ELO-CHESS.
this output has two parts: (1) CONFERENCE AVERAGES
&nbsp (listed top-to-bottom & alphabetically)
&nbsp (2) teams listed by CONFERENCE
&nbsp (listed in order within conferences)

The SCHEDULE ratings represent the average schedule difficulty faced
by each team in the games that it’s played so far. The schedule
difficulty of a given game takes into account the rating of the
opponent and the location of the game.

In COLLEGE FOOTBALL the W-L records include ALL games, but ONLY
games between the 240 TEAMS RATED&nbsphere are used for RATING and SCHEDULE
STRENGTH computations.

To make predictions for upcoming games, simply compare the RATINGS of
the teams in question and allow an ADDITIONAL 3 points for the home
team. Thus, for example, a HOME team with a rating of 92 would be
favored by 5 points over a VISITING team having a rating of 90.
Or a VISITING team with a rating of 89 would be favored by 7 points
over a HOME team having a rating of 79.

NOTE: Use whatever home advantage is listed in the output below.
&nbsp In the example just above, a home edge of 3 was shown for
&nbsp illustrative purposes. The home edge will vary during the season.

The numbers to the right of a team’s schedule strength are its rank of
schedule – (in parentheses) – and its record versus teams in these
rating’s CURRENT top 10
&nbspand CURRENT top 30&nbsprespectively.

For the first few weeks of the season, the starting ratings have weight
in the process(BAYESIAN), but once the teams are all CONNECTED, then
the starting ratings are no longer used and all teams are started equal
and the ELO-CHESS&nbspis then done in an UNBIASED&nbspmanner from that point on.
RATING&nbspand PREDICTOR&nbspare unbiased&nbspand so is ELO-CHESS.

In RATING, all games count equally. This overall RATING&nbspis always on the left.
—————————————————————————————————————-
In ELO-CHESS, only winning&nbspand losing&nbspmatters; the score margin&nbspis of no consequence,
which makes it very “politically correct”. However it is less accurate&nbspin its predictions&nbspfor
upcoming games&nbspthan is the PURE POINTS, in which the score margin&nbspis the only thing&nbspthat matters.
PURE POINTS&nbspis also known as PREDICTOR, BALLANTINE, RHEINGOLD, WHITE OWL&nbspand is the best single PREDICTOR
of future games. The ELO-CHESS&nbspwill be utilized by the Bowl Championship Series(BCS).
—————————————————————————————————————-
The overall RATING&nbspis a synthesis&nbspof the two diametrical opposites, ELO-CHESS&nbspand PURE POINTS (PREDICTOR).

There are two group ratings, the “central mean”&nbspand the
“simple average”&nbsp(also known as the “arithmetic mean”)
The “central mean”&nbspgives the most weight to the middle team(s)
in the group and progressively less weight to teams as you go
away from the middle in either direction, up or down.

This tends to smooth out the effect of anomalous teams that are rated
much higher and lower than the middle team(s) in the group. The
“simple average” (“arithmetic mean”)&nbspweights each team equally
no matter where they are relative to the middle.

Here are a few examples of how the “central mean”&nbspis computed.
&nbsp 4-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-2-1
&nbsp 5-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-2-1
&nbsp 6-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-3-2-1
&nbsp 7-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-3-2-1
&nbsp 8-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-4-3-2-1
&nbsp 9-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-5-4-3-2-1
&nbsp10-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-5-5-4-3-2-1
&nbsp11-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-5-6-5-4-3-2-1
&nbsp12-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-5-6-6-5-4-3-2-1
&nbsp13-team group ___ the weights are 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-6-5-4-3-2-1
This is in a sense the continuous version of the discrete “tri-mean”.

&nbsp  CONFERENCE CENTRAL MEAN SIMPLE AVERAGE TEAMS

&nbsp 1 ATLANTIC COAST (A) = 79.91 79.11 ( 1) 9
&nbsp 2 SOUTHEASTERN (A) = 79.62 78.67 ( 2) 12
&nbsp 3 BIG TEN (A) = 77.59 76.44 ( 4) 11
&nbsp 4 PAC-10 (A) = 76.37 76.79 ( 3) 10
&nbsp 5 BIG 12 (A) = 76.25 75.61 ( 5) 12
&nbsp 6 BIG EAST (A) = 74.45 73.86 ( 6) 8
&nbsp 7 MOUNTAIN WEST (A) = 71.85 72.14 ( 7) 8
&nbsp 8 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 70.49 70.08 ( 8) 4
&nbsp 9 CONFERENCE USA (A) = 65.12 64.16 ( 10) 11
&nbsp 10 MID-AMERICAN (A) = 63.60 64.68 ( 9) 14
&nbsp 11 WESTERN ATHLETIC (A) = 63.41 63.23 ( 11) 10
&nbsp 12 GATEWAY (AA)= 57.85 57.15 ( 12) 8
&nbsp 13 BIG SKY (AA)= 57.69 57.09 ( 13) 8
&nbsp 14 ATLANTIC 10 (AA)= 55.54 56.15 ( 14) 11
&nbsp 15 SUN BELT (A) = 53.84 54.23 ( 15) 8
&nbsp 16 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 48.72 48.89 ( 16) 6
&nbsp 17 SOUTHERN (AA)= 47.52 47.47 ( 17) 9
&nbsp 18 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 45.90 46.25 ( 18) 8
&nbsp 19 PATRIOT LEAGUE (AA)= 45.13 45.90 ( 19) 8
&nbsp 20 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 43.40 41.82 ( 21) 9
&nbsp 21 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 42.60 42.28 ( 20) 9
&nbsp 22 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 37.30 35.81 ( 22) 9
&nbsp 23 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 33.19 32.11 ( 23) 5
&nbsp 24 SOUTHWESTERN (AA)= 32.43 31.56 ( 24) 10
&nbsp 25 PIONEER (AA)= 26.64 26.30 ( 25) 9
&nbsp 26 NORTHEAST (AA)= 23.09 23.08 ( 26) 8
&nbsp 27 METRO ATLANTIC (AA)= 12.32 13.17 ( 27) 6
&nbsp 28 ***UNRATED*** (**)= -96.18 -96.18 ( 28) 1

&nbsp  CONFERENCE CENTRAL MEAN SIMPLE AVERAGE TEAMS

&nbsp 1 ATLANTIC COAST (A) = 79.91 79.11 ( 1) 9
&nbsp 6 BIG EAST (A) = 74.45 73.86 ( 6) 8
&nbsp 3 BIG TEN (A) = 77.59 76.44 ( 4) 11
&nbsp 5 BIG 12 (A) = 76.25 75.61 ( 5) 12
&nbsp 9 CONFERENCE USA (A) = 65.12 64.16 ( 10) 11
&nbsp 10 MID-AMERICAN (A) = 63.60 64.68 ( 9) 14
&nbsp 7 MOUNTAIN WEST (A) = 71.85 72.14 ( 7) 8
&nbsp 4 PAC-10 (A) = 76.37 76.79 ( 3) 10
&nbsp 2 SOUTHEASTERN (A) = 79.62 78.67 ( 2) 12
&nbsp 15 SUN BELT (A) = 53.84 54.23 ( 15) 8
&nbsp 11 WESTERN ATHLETIC (A) = 63.41 63.23 ( 11) 10
&nbsp 8 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 70.49 70.08 ( 8) 4
&nbsp 14 ATLANTIC 10 (AA)= 55.54 56.15 ( 14) 11
&nbsp 13 BIG SKY (AA)= 57.69 57.09 ( 13) 8
&nbsp 23 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 33.19 32.11 ( 23) 5
&nbsp 12 GATEWAY (AA)= 57.85 57.15 ( 12) 8
&nbsp 18 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 45.90 46.25 ( 18) 8
&nbsp 27 METRO ATLANTIC (AA)= 12.32 13.17 ( 27) 6
&nbsp 22 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 37.30 35.81 ( 22) 9
&nbsp 26 NORTHEAST (AA)= 23.09 23.08 ( 26) 8
&nbsp 21 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 42.60 42.28 ( 20) 9
&nbsp 19 PATRIOT LEAGUE (AA)= 45.13 45.90 ( 19) 8
&nbsp 25 PIONEER (AA)= 26.64 26.30 ( 25) 9
&nbsp 17 SOUTHERN (AA)= 47.52 47.47 ( 17) 9
&nbsp 16 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 48.72 48.89 ( 16) 6
&nbsp 24 SOUTHWESTERN (AA)= 32.43 31.56 ( 24) 10
&nbsp 20 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 43.40 41.82 ( 21) 9
&nbsp 28 ***UNRATED*** (**)= -96.18 -96.18 ( 28) 1
__________________________________________________________________________________________________

By Conference

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 1 ATLANTIC COAST (A) = 79.91 79.11 ( 1) TEAMS= 9
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 6 Florida St. A =&nbsp 90.55&nbsp 10 3 79.43( 2) 1 2 | 4 3 |&nbsp 88.66 10 |&nbsp 92.07 4
&nbsp 10 Maryland A =&nbsp 87.46&nbsp 10 3 73.24( 43) 0 1 | 3 1 |&nbsp 85.71 13 |&nbsp 88.80 10
&nbsp 17 Clemson A =&nbsp 85.25&nbsp 9 4 75.33( 23) 1 2 | 3 3 |&nbsp 85.34 15 |&nbsp 84.69 15
&nbsp 26 No. Carolina St. A =&nbsp 82.01&nbsp 8 5 75.27( 24) 0 2 | 3 3 |&nbsp 80.25 27 |&nbsp 83.35 23
&nbsp 27 Virginia A =&nbsp 81.81&nbsp 8 5 75.68( 18) 0 2 | 0 4 |&nbsp 79.72 29 |&nbsp 83.53 19
&nbsp 33 Georgia Tech A =&nbsp 79.66&nbsp 7 6 77.24( 6) 1 2 | 3 4 |&nbsp 78.18 36 |&nbsp 80.68 32
&nbsp 46 Wake Forest A =&nbsp 74.51&nbsp 5 7 76.30( 12) 0 2 | 2 4 |&nbsp 72.31 60 |&nbsp 76.32 43
&nbsp 75 Duke A =&nbsp 66.63&nbsp 4 8 75.20( 26) 0 2 | 0 6 |&nbsp 66.68 82 |&nbsp 66.08 81
&nbsp 93 North Carolina A =&nbsp 64.16&nbsp 2 10 76.62( 11) 0 2 | 0 5 |&nbsp 60.40 107 |&nbsp 67.64 75
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 6 BIG EAST (A) = 74.45 73.86 ( 6) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 7 Miami-Florida A =&nbsp 89.02&nbsp 11 2 73.58( 40) 2 0 | 3 1 |&nbsp 91.21 5 |&nbsp 86.85 12
&nbsp 36 Virginia Tech A =&nbsp 77.25&nbsp 8 5 70.50( 60) 1 0 | 1 2 |&nbsp 73.67 48 |&nbsp 80.83 31
&nbsp 37 Boston College A =&nbsp 77.05&nbsp 8 5 72.33( 50) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 76.17 40 |&nbsp 77.42 39
&nbsp 39 Pittsburgh A =&nbsp 76.17&nbsp 8 5 71.65( 55) 0 1 | 0 2 |&nbsp 74.45 44 |&nbsp 77.46 38
&nbsp 42 West Virginia A =&nbsp 76.02&nbsp 8 5 71.54( 56) 0 3 | 0 3 |&nbsp 74.44 45 |&nbsp 77.14 40
&nbsp 61 Syracuse A =&nbsp 71.79&nbsp 6 6 70.87( 59) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 69.74 68 |&nbsp 73.42 51
&nbsp 74 Rutgers A =&nbsp 66.66&nbsp 5 7 69.85( 66) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 63.92 91 |&nbsp 69.04 68
&nbsp120 Temple A =&nbsp 56.93&nbsp 1 11 72.01( 53) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 50.88 137 |&nbsp 62.61 96
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 3 BIG TEN (A) = 77.59 76.44 ( 4) TEAMS= 11
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 8 Michigan A =&nbsp 88.96&nbsp 10 3 74.51( 36) 0 2 | 3 2 |&nbsp 87.71 11 |&nbsp 89.73 5
&nbsp 9 Iowa A =&nbsp 88.39&nbsp 10 3 74.92( 29) 2 0 | 4 2 |&nbsp 89.29 9 |&nbsp 87.17 11
&nbsp 11 Ohio St. A =&nbsp 87.24&nbsp 11 2 76.11( 15) 1 1 | 4 1 |&nbsp 90.72 6 |&nbsp 84.23 17
&nbsp 22 Purdue A =&nbsp 83.35&nbsp 9 4 74.79( 31) 1 2 | 1 3 |&nbsp 82.84 23 |&nbsp 83.36 21
&nbsp 24 Minnesota A =&nbsp 82.67&nbsp 10 3 68.75( 69) 0 2 | 0 2 |&nbsp 81.52 26 |&nbsp 83.33 24
&nbsp 34 Michigan St. A =&nbsp 78.02&nbsp 8 5 73.41( 41) 1 1 | 2 3 |&nbsp 77.01 38 |&nbsp 78.54 35
&nbsp 38 Wisconsin A =&nbsp 76.82&nbsp 7 6 74.72( 34) 0 1 | 1 4 |&nbsp 74.58 43 |&nbsp 78.68 34
&nbsp 58 Northwestern A =&nbsp 72.29&nbsp 6 7 75.47( 20) 0 2 | 0 5 |&nbsp 72.31 59 |&nbsp 71.78 56
&nbsp 71 Penn St. A =&nbsp 68.29&nbsp 3 9 74.74( 33) 0 1 | 0 5 |&nbsp 62.93 95 |&nbsp 73.93 49
&nbsp116 Illinois A =&nbsp 57.95&nbsp 1 11 75.36( 21) 0 2 | 0 5 |&nbsp 54.09 124 |&nbsp 61.39 103
&nbsp121 Indiana A =&nbsp 56.87&nbsp 2 10 72.80( 46) 0 1 | 0 4 |&nbsp 54.99 122 |&nbsp 58.26 119
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 5 BIG 12 (A) = 76.25 75.61 ( 5) TEAMS= 12
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 3 Oklahoma A =&nbsp 92.88&nbsp 12 2 74.29( 39) 0 1 | 2 2 |&nbsp 89.34 8 |&nbsp 96.84 1
&nbsp 13 Texas A =&nbsp 86.25&nbsp 10 3 72.60( 47) 0 1 | 3 3 |&nbsp 83.20 21 |&nbsp 89.27 6
&nbsp 14 Kansas St. A =&nbsp 85.53&nbsp 11 4 72.42( 49) 1 0 | 3 2 |&nbsp 82.26 25 |&nbsp 88.86 9
&nbsp 23 Nebraska A =&nbsp 82.96&nbsp 10 3 71.28( 58) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 83.36 19 |&nbsp 82.12 28
&nbsp 30 Texas Tech A =&nbsp 80.46&nbsp 8 5 72.52( 48) 0 1 | 1 3 |&nbsp 78.20 35 |&nbsp 82.39 26
&nbsp 32 Oklahoma St. A =&nbsp 79.83&nbsp 9 4 69.91( 64) 0 1 | 2 4 |&nbsp 77.70 37 |&nbsp 81.59 30
&nbsp 41 Missouri A =&nbsp 76.10&nbsp 8 5 69.59( 68) 0 1 | 2 3 |&nbsp 74.21 47 |&nbsp 77.57 37
&nbsp 57 Colorado A =&nbsp 72.52&nbsp 5 7 76.77( 8) 0 2 | 0 6 |&nbsp 73.14 50 |&nbsp 71.45 58
&nbsp 72 Kansas A =&nbsp 68.24&nbsp 6 7 70.47( 61) 0 0 | 0 3 |&nbsp 68.09 74 |&nbsp 67.89 73
&nbsp 80 Texas A&M A =&nbsp 65.97&nbsp 4 8 75.13( 27) 0 1 | 1 4 |&nbsp 67.92 75 |&nbsp 63.66 91
&nbsp106 Iowa St. A =&nbsp 60.75&nbsp 2 10 76.69( 10) 0 2 | 0 6 |&nbsp 62.03 101 |&nbsp 59.01 114
&nbsp124 Baylor A =&nbsp 55.80&nbsp 3 9 70.01( 63) 0 1 | 0 4 |&nbsp 57.76 111 |&nbsp 53.32 140
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 9 CONFERENCE USA (A) = 65.12 64.16 ( 10) TEAMS= 11
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 45 TCU A =&nbsp 74.51&nbsp 11 2 63.63( 107) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 78.38 33 |&nbsp 70.88 61
&nbsp 51 Southern Miss A =&nbsp 73.72&nbsp 9 4 68.41( 74) 0 0 | 0 3 |&nbsp 75.53 42 |&nbsp 71.63 57
&nbsp 60 Memphis A =&nbsp 71.96&nbsp 9 4 62.17( 113) 0 0 | 1 0 |&nbsp 72.35 58 |&nbsp 71.10 60
&nbsp 63 Louisville A =&nbsp 71.47&nbsp 9 4 63.72( 104) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 71.88 61 |&nbsp 70.59 65
&nbsp 82 South Florida A =&nbsp 65.46&nbsp 7 4 59.18( 118) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 67.51 79 |&nbsp 63.04 94
&nbsp 88 Houston A =&nbsp 64.97&nbsp 7 6 65.26( 94) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 65.73 86 |&nbsp 63.75 90
&nbsp 94 UAB A =&nbsp 64.13&nbsp 5 7 67.36( 81) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 64.69 89 |&nbsp 63.10 93
&nbsp 96 Cincinnati A =&nbsp 63.80&nbsp 5 7 65.86( 88) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 62.17 99 |&nbsp 64.95 85
&nbsp109 Tulane A =&nbsp 60.28&nbsp 5 7 64.84( 96) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 61.11 105 |&nbsp 58.96 115
&nbsp143 East Carolina A =&nbsp 51.25&nbsp 1 11 68.30( 76) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 48.20 150 |&nbsp 53.77 138
&nbsp171 Army A =&nbsp 44.20&nbsp 0 13 66.81( 83) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 39.10 187 |&nbsp 48.35 162
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 10 MID-AMERICAN (A) = 63.60 64.68 ( 9) TEAMS= 14
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 5 Miami-Ohio A =&nbsp 90.63&nbsp 13 1 68.46( 72) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 91.89 4 |&nbsp 89.14 7
&nbsp 31 Bowling Green A =&nbsp 80.38&nbsp 11 3 67.69( 79) 0 2 | 1 3 |&nbsp 84.94 17 |&nbsp 76.52 42
&nbsp 47 Northern Illinois A =&nbsp 74.45&nbsp 10 2 61.60( 114) 1 0 | 1 0 |&nbsp 78.39 32 |&nbsp 70.76 63
&nbsp 56 Marshall A =&nbsp 72.70&nbsp 8 4 66.16( 84) 0 1 | 1 2 |&nbsp 73.05 51 |&nbsp 71.89 55
&nbsp 59 Toledo A =&nbsp 72.13&nbsp 8 4 63.68( 106) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 72.58 54 |&nbsp 71.22 59
&nbsp 90 Akron A =&nbsp 64.65&nbsp 7 5 60.61( 115) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 62.06 100 |&nbsp 66.85 79
&nbsp 92 Western Michigan A =&nbsp 64.17&nbsp 5 7 67.32( 82) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 63.67 92 |&nbsp 64.18 88
&nbsp104 Kent St. A =&nbsp 61.25&nbsp 5 7 66.16( 85) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 60.33 108 |&nbsp 61.66 102
&nbsp108 Ball St. A =&nbsp 60.41&nbsp 4 8 68.44( 73) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 61.59 102 |&nbsp 58.76 117
&nbsp126 UCF(Central Florida) A =&nbsp 55.28&nbsp 3 9 65.95( 87) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 53.93 125 |&nbsp 56.13 128
&nbsp132 Central Michigan A =&nbsp 53.54&nbsp 3 9 65.38( 90) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 52.63 129 |&nbsp 53.95 137
&nbsp133 Eastern Michigan A =&nbsp 53.52&nbsp 3 9 65.28( 92) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 53.37 126 |&nbsp 53.17 143
&nbsp134 Ohio U. A =&nbsp 53.32&nbsp 2 10 65.42( 89) 0 1 | 0 2 |&nbsp 48.48 148 |&nbsp 57.59 122
&nbsp155 Buffalo A =&nbsp 49.11&nbsp 1 11 69.82( 67) 0 2 | 0 2 |&nbsp 47.46 152 |&nbsp 50.26 150
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 7 MOUNTAIN WEST (A) = 71.85 72.14 ( 7) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 25 Utah A =&nbsp 82.18&nbsp 10 2 70.44( 62) 0 0 | 1 0 |&nbsp 83.87 18 |&nbsp 80.28 33
&nbsp 44 Colorado St. A =&nbsp 74.61&nbsp 7 6 73.09( 45) 0 1 | 1 2 |&nbsp 73.20 49 |&nbsp 75.54 44
&nbsp 49 New Mexico A =&nbsp 73.98&nbsp 8 5 68.71( 70) 0 0 | 1 3 |&nbsp 72.51 56 |&nbsp 74.98 45
&nbsp 54 Air Force A =&nbsp 73.05&nbsp 7 5 68.30( 77) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 71.55 62 |&nbsp 74.07 46
&nbsp 65 UNLV A =&nbsp 70.65&nbsp 6 6 71.50( 57) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 70.87 65 |&nbsp 69.95 67
&nbsp 68 BYU A =&nbsp 68.87&nbsp 4 8 76.15( 14) 0 1 | 0 3 |&nbsp 69.04 70 |&nbsp 68.21 72
&nbsp 70 San Diego St. A =&nbsp 68.44&nbsp 6 6 68.37( 75) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 67.52 78 |&nbsp 68.86 70
&nbsp 83 Wyoming A =&nbsp 65.31&nbsp 4 8 71.83( 54) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 63.04 94 |&nbsp 67.16 78
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 4 PAC-10 (A) = 76.37 76.79 ( 3) TEAMS= 10
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 2 Southern Cal A =&nbsp 95.54&nbsp 12 1 75.57( 19) 1 0 | 4 1 |&nbsp 95.56 2 |&nbsp 95.07 3
&nbsp 15 Washington St. A =&nbsp 85.37&nbsp 10 3 74.39( 38) 0 1 | 2 1 |&nbsp 87.28 12 |&nbsp 83.35 22
&nbsp 28 Oregon St. A =&nbsp 81.46&nbsp 8 5 72.23( 51) 0 1 | 2 2 |&nbsp 80.12 28 |&nbsp 82.32 27
&nbsp 29 California A =&nbsp 80.54&nbsp 8 6 75.35( 22) 1 0 | 1 3 |&nbsp 78.83 31 |&nbsp 81.82 29
&nbsp 35 Oregon A =&nbsp 77.81&nbsp 8 5 74.77( 32) 1 0 | 3 3 |&nbsp 78.36 34 |&nbsp 76.82 41
&nbsp 50 Washington A =&nbsp 73.89&nbsp 6 6 73.11( 44) 0 1 | 2 3 |&nbsp 74.43 46 |&nbsp 72.91 53
&nbsp 62 Arizona St. A =&nbsp 71.70&nbsp 5 7 74.42( 37) 0 2 | 0 5 |&nbsp 70.90 64 |&nbsp 71.99 54
&nbsp 64 UCLA A =&nbsp 71.46&nbsp 6 7 75.22( 25) 0 2 | 1 3 |&nbsp 72.47 57 |&nbsp 70.04 66
&nbsp 69 Stanford A =&nbsp 68.48&nbsp 4 7 75.73( 17) 0 1 | 0 4 |&nbsp 70.63 66 |&nbsp 66.02 82
&nbsp101 Arizona A =&nbsp 61.66&nbsp 2 10 77.75( 4) 0 2 | 0 6 |&nbsp 63.33 93 |&nbsp 59.54 110
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 2 SOUTHEASTERN (A) = 79.62 78.67 ( 2) TEAMS= 12
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 1 LSU A =&nbsp 97.43&nbsp 13 1 74.95( 28) 3 0 | 6 1 |&nbsp 98.21 1 |&nbsp 96.33 2
&nbsp 4 Georgia A =&nbsp 90.67&nbsp 11 3 77.60( 5) 0 2 | 4 3 |&nbsp 92.01 3 |&nbsp 89.13 8
&nbsp 16 Mississippi A =&nbsp 85.29&nbsp 10 3 72.16( 52) 0 1 | 3 2 |&nbsp 85.44 14 |&nbsp 84.69 16
&nbsp 18 Auburn A =&nbsp 84.59&nbsp 8 5 76.20( 13) 0 3 | 2 4 |&nbsp 82.96 22 |&nbsp 85.79 13
&nbsp 19 Arkansas A =&nbsp 84.07&nbsp 9 4 74.55( 35) 0 1 | 1 4 |&nbsp 82.73 24 |&nbsp 84.94 14
&nbsp 20 Tennessee A =&nbsp 84.01&nbsp 10 3 74.82( 30) 1 1 | 2 3 |&nbsp 85.04 16 |&nbsp 82.65 25
&nbsp 21 Florida A =&nbsp 83.62&nbsp 8 5 76.83( 7) 2 3 | 3 5 |&nbsp 83.28 20 |&nbsp 83.46 20
&nbsp 48 Alabama A =&nbsp 74.31&nbsp 4 9 78.43( 3) 0 3 | 0 7 |&nbsp 70.47 67 |&nbsp 78.17 36
&nbsp 52 South Carolina A =&nbsp 73.55&nbsp 5 7 76.72( 9) 0 2 | 1 7 |&nbsp 72.58 55 |&nbsp 74.03 48
&nbsp 81 Kentucky A =&nbsp 65.71&nbsp 4 8 68.62( 71) 0 1 | 0 4 |&nbsp 60.64 106 |&nbsp 70.82 62
&nbsp105 Vanderbilt A =&nbsp 61.16&nbsp 2 10 73.27( 42) 0 1 | 0 5 |&nbsp 57.15 115 |&nbsp 64.84 86
&nbsp111 Mississippi St. A =&nbsp 59.63&nbsp 2 10 75.97( 16) 0 1 | 0 5 |&nbsp 59.80 110 |&nbsp 58.96 116
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 15 SUN BELT (A) = 53.84 54.23 ( 15) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 73 North Texas A =&nbsp 67.79&nbsp 9 4 62.42( 112) 0 1 | 0 2 |&nbsp 66.30 84 |&nbsp 68.80 71
&nbsp119 Middle Tennessee A =&nbsp 57.35&nbsp 4 8 63.71( 105) 0 1 | 0 2 |&nbsp 52.02 133 |&nbsp 62.29 98
&nbsp125 Utah St. A =&nbsp 55.78&nbsp 3 9 64.21( 100) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 48.81 146 |&nbsp 62.32 97
&nbsp131 Idaho A =&nbsp 53.73&nbsp 3 9 62.74( 110) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 47.47 151 |&nbsp 59.39 111
&nbsp136 Louisiana-Lafayette A =&nbsp 52.99&nbsp 4 8 62.78( 109) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 50.85 138 |&nbsp 54.62 134
&nbsp142 New Mexico St. A =&nbsp 51.86&nbsp 3 9 65.28( 91) 0 0 | 0 3 |&nbsp 44.34 166 |&nbsp 58.53 118
&nbsp147 Arkansas St. A =&nbsp 50.29&nbsp 5 7 58.14( 123) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 50.32 140 |&nbsp 49.74 155
&nbsp172 Louisiana-Monroe A =&nbsp 44.04&nbsp 1 11 64.18( 101) 0 1 | 0 3 |&nbsp 36.26 195 |&nbsp 50.19 151
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 11 WESTERN ATHLETIC (A) = 63.41 63.23 ( 11) TEAMS= 10
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 12 Boise St. A =&nbsp 86.74&nbsp 13 1 63.84( 103) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 89.42 7 |&nbsp 84.21 18
&nbsp 55 Fresno St. A =&nbsp 72.77&nbsp 9 5 67.87( 78) 0 1 | 1 3 |&nbsp 76.91 39 |&nbsp 68.88 69
&nbsp 66 Hawaii A =&nbsp 70.30&nbsp 9 5 65.27( 93) 0 1 | 0 2 |&nbsp 72.68 53 |&nbsp 67.68 74
&nbsp 76 Tulsa A =&nbsp 66.48&nbsp 8 5 63.98( 102) 0 0 | 0 3 |&nbsp 68.19 72 |&nbsp 64.38 87
&nbsp 86 Louisiana Tech A =&nbsp 65.05&nbsp 5 7 69.89( 65) 0 2 | 0 3 |&nbsp 66.36 83 |&nbsp 63.31 92
&nbsp 95 Nevada A =&nbsp 64.07&nbsp 6 6 66.01( 86) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 66.96 81 |&nbsp 60.88 105
&nbsp103 Rice A =&nbsp 61.51&nbsp 5 7 64.26( 99) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 61.43 104 |&nbsp 61.08 104
&nbsp127 San Jose St. A =&nbsp 54.62&nbsp 3 8 64.94( 95) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 54.66 123 |&nbsp 54.07 136
&nbsp160 UTEP A =&nbsp 46.86&nbsp 2 11 62.74( 111) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 45.25 164 |&nbsp 47.97 163
&nbsp174 SMU A =&nbsp 43.90&nbsp 0 12 67.39( 80) 0 0 | 0 2 |&nbsp 39.53 185 |&nbsp 47.44 165
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 8 I-A INDEPENDENTS (A) = 70.49 70.08 ( 8) TEAMS= 4
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 43 Notre Dame A =&nbsp 75.19&nbsp 5 7 79.45( 1) 0 3 | 1 4 |&nbsp 75.89 41 |&nbsp 74.07 47
&nbsp 53 Connecticut A =&nbsp 73.39&nbsp 9 3 64.59( 98) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 72.85 52 |&nbsp 73.43 50
&nbsp 67 Navy A =&nbsp 69.22&nbsp 8 5 62.94( 108) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 67.35 80 |&nbsp 70.66 64
&nbsp 98 Troy St. A =&nbsp 62.50&nbsp 6 6 64.65( 97) 0 0 | 0 4 |&nbsp 64.74 88 |&nbsp 59.87 109
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 14 ATLANTIC 10 (AA)= 55.54 56.15 ( 14) TEAMS= 11
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 40 Delaware AA =&nbsp 76.15&nbsp 15 1 56.85( 127) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 78.93 30 |&nbsp 73.35 52
&nbsp 85 Massachusetts AA =&nbsp 65.21&nbsp 10 3 55.09( 135) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 67.87 77 |&nbsp 62.26 99
&nbsp100 Villanova AA =&nbsp 62.34&nbsp 7 4 54.82( 139) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 57.24 113 |&nbsp 67.31 76
&nbsp102 Northeastern AA =&nbsp 61.53&nbsp 8 4 54.17( 142) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 57.55 112 |&nbsp 65.20 84
&nbsp122 Maine AA =&nbsp 56.79&nbsp 6 5 53.99( 144) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 52.98 127 |&nbsp 60.14 107
&nbsp128 William & Mary AA =&nbsp 54.21&nbsp 5 5 55.35( 133) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 52.20 131 |&nbsp 55.73 131
&nbsp138 James Madison AA =&nbsp 52.71&nbsp 6 6 51.62( 150) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 49.81 143 |&nbsp 55.10 132
&nbsp144 New Hampshire AA =&nbsp 51.20&nbsp 5 7 51.66( 149) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 47.12 155 |&nbsp 54.69 133
&nbsp151 Rhode Island AA =&nbsp 50.00&nbsp 4 8 56.10( 131) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 46.13 160 |&nbsp 53.27 141
&nbsp170 Hofstra AA =&nbsp 44.46&nbsp 2 10 56.20( 130) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 39.36 186 |&nbsp 48.62 160
&nbsp178 Richmond AA =&nbsp 43.08&nbsp 2 9 56.87( 126) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 39.89 183 |&nbsp 45.61 168
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 13 BIG SKY (AA)= 57.69 57.09 ( 13) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 84 Montana AA =&nbsp 65.23&nbsp 9 4 54.78( 140) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 62.82 96 |&nbsp 67.22 77
&nbsp 99 Northern Arizona AA =&nbsp 62.40&nbsp 9 4 54.89( 138) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 62.50 98 |&nbsp 61.81 101
&nbsp112 Montana St. AA =&nbsp 59.57&nbsp 7 6 55.15( 134) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 56.49 116 |&nbsp 62.23 100
&nbsp114 Idaho St. AA =&nbsp 58.91&nbsp 8 4 59.30( 117) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 61.51 103 |&nbsp 55.86 130
&nbsp115 Eastern Washington AA =&nbsp 58.10&nbsp 6 5 57.78( 125) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 55.70 118 |&nbsp 60.02 108
&nbsp117 Weber St. AA =&nbsp 57.61&nbsp 8 4 54.93( 137) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 57.23 114 |&nbsp 57.49 123
&nbsp154 Portland St. AA =&nbsp 49.27&nbsp 4 7 58.51( 121) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 48.74 147 |&nbsp 49.30 158
&nbsp165 Sacramento St. AA =&nbsp 45.62&nbsp 2 9 56.41( 129) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 41.00 179 |&nbsp 49.42 156
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 23 BIG SOUTH (AA)= 33.19 32.11 ( 23) TEAMS= 5
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp176 Gardner-Webb AA =&nbsp 43.59&nbsp 8 4 41.85( 192) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 45.32 163 |&nbsp 41.19 187
&nbsp194 VMI AA =&nbsp 38.05&nbsp 6 6 34.78( 208) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 33.87 202 |&nbsp 41.29 186
&nbsp197 Liberty AA =&nbsp 37.26&nbsp 6 6 44.09( 186) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 38.51 189 |&nbsp 35.35 201
&nbsp218 Coastal Carolina AA =&nbsp 25.56&nbsp 6 5 28.68( 220) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 24.05 221 |&nbsp 26.51 215
&nbsp232 Charleston Southern AA =&nbsp 16.10&nbsp 1 11 45.79( 180) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 18.03 228 |&nbsp 12.98 232
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 12 GATEWAY (AA)= 57.85 57.15 ( 12) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 77 Western Illinois AA =&nbsp 66.20&nbsp 9 4 58.84( 120) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 65.74 85 |&nbsp 66.17 80
&nbsp 78 Southern Illinois AA =&nbsp 66.19&nbsp 10 2 55.53( 132) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 69.26 69 |&nbsp 62.92 95
&nbsp 79 Northern Iowa AA =&nbsp 66.06&nbsp 10 3 57.96( 124) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 67.88 76 |&nbsp 63.86 89
&nbsp 89 Western Kentucky AA =&nbsp 64.89&nbsp 9 4 58.87( 119) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 64.04 90 |&nbsp 65.24 83
&nbsp141 Illinois St. AA =&nbsp 52.29&nbsp 6 6 53.32( 145) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 51.80 134 |&nbsp 52.28 146
&nbsp148 SMS(SW Missouri St.) AA =&nbsp 50.19&nbsp 4 7 60.09( 116) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 46.61 156 |&nbsp 53.18 142
&nbsp152 Youngstown St. AA =&nbsp 49.54&nbsp 5 7 56.69( 128) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 48.42 149 |&nbsp 50.16 152
&nbsp183 Indiana St. AA =&nbsp 41.86&nbsp 3 9 54.01( 143) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.85 171 |&nbsp 41.36 185
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 18 IVY LEAGUE (AA)= 45.90 46.25 ( 18) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 91 Pennsylvania AA =&nbsp 64.54&nbsp 10 0 43.90( 188) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 68.19 73 |&nbsp 60.71 106
&nbsp140 Harvard AA =&nbsp 52.50&nbsp 7 3 44.74( 183) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 49.98 141 |&nbsp 54.50 135
&nbsp150 Yale AA =&nbsp 50.04&nbsp 6 4 45.82( 179) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 47.14 154 |&nbsp 52.39 145
&nbsp164 Brown AA =&nbsp 45.91&nbsp 5 5 46.16( 176) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 44.26 167 |&nbsp 47.06 166
&nbsp167 Dartmouth AA =&nbsp 44.85&nbsp 5 5 47.31( 167) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 45.64 162 |&nbsp 43.49 176
&nbsp184 Columbia AA =&nbsp 41.56&nbsp 4 6 46.65( 172) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 40.85 180 |&nbsp 41.78 184
&nbsp187 Princeton AA =&nbsp 40.11&nbsp 2 8 49.59( 155) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 35.59 199 |&nbsp 43.67 174
&nbsp210 Cornell AA =&nbsp 30.47&nbsp 1 9 47.30( 168) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 27.43 212 |&nbsp 32.71 205
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 27 METRO ATLANTIC (AA)= 12.32 13.17 ( 27) TEAMS= 6
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp205 Duquesne AA =&nbsp 34.26&nbsp 8 3 23.15( 230) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 35.51 200 |&nbsp 32.32 206
&nbsp226 Iona AA =&nbsp 17.72&nbsp 6 5 17.50( 239) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 19.29 226 |&nbsp 15.18 228
&nbsp233 Marist AA =&nbsp 14.02&nbsp 4 6 21.11( 235) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 16.66 232 |&nbsp 9.53 233
&nbsp237 Saint Peter’s AA =&nbsp 8.69&nbsp 2 8 22.58( 232) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 8.70 237 |&nbsp 8.16 236
&nbsp239 La Salle AA =&nbsp 5.70&nbsp 3 8 16.97( 240) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 5.82 239 |&nbsp 5.04 238
&nbsp240 Siena AA =&nbsp -1.40&nbsp 0 11 21.68( 233) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp -6.84 240 |&nbsp 1.55 239
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 22 MID-EASTERN (AA)= 37.30 35.81 ( 22) TEAMS= 9
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp166 No. Carolina A&T AA =&nbsp 45.42&nbsp 10 3 38.11( 198) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 49.93 142 |&nbsp 39.67 192
&nbsp169 Bethune-Cookman AA =&nbsp 44.61&nbsp 9 3 35.17( 206) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 46.09 161 |&nbsp 42.50 180
&nbsp173 So. Carolina St. AA =&nbsp 44.02&nbsp 8 4 36.95( 201) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 44.94 165 |&nbsp 42.54 179
&nbsp185 Hampton AA =&nbsp 41.52&nbsp 7 4 35.58( 204) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.47 174 |&nbsp 41.06 189
&nbsp189 Florida A&M AA =&nbsp 39.49&nbsp 6 6 40.28( 194) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 39.98 181 |&nbsp 38.44 194
&nbsp200 Morgan St. AA =&nbsp 36.66&nbsp 6 5 35.11( 207) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 37.78 191 |&nbsp 34.89 203
&nbsp209 Howard AA =&nbsp 31.13&nbsp 4 7 36.74( 202) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 31.66 208 |&nbsp 30.02 211
&nbsp223 Delaware St. AA =&nbsp 22.80&nbsp 1 10 38.82( 197) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 21.33 224 |&nbsp 23.70 221
&nbsp228 Norfolk St. AA =&nbsp 16.68&nbsp 1 11 36.41( 203) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 18.39 227 |&nbsp 13.93 231
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 26 NORTHEAST (AA)= 23.09 23.08 ( 26) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp202 Albany (NY) AA =&nbsp 34.94&nbsp 7 4 28.25( 223) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 32.81 205 |&nbsp 36.47 197
&nbsp206 Monmouth-NJ AA =&nbsp 33.67&nbsp 10 2 21.48( 234) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 35.35 201 |&nbsp 31.21 209
&nbsp219 Stony Brook AA =&nbsp 25.14&nbsp 6 4 20.93( 236) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 25.56 219 |&nbsp 24.15 219
&nbsp220 Robert Morris AA =&nbsp 24.63&nbsp 6 4 22.93( 231) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 24.98 220 |&nbsp 23.71 220
&nbsp224 Sacred Heart AA =&nbsp 20.90&nbsp 6 5 19.38( 237) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 21.66 223 |&nbsp 19.48 224
&nbsp225 Wagner AA =&nbsp 20.01&nbsp 6 5 17.93( 238) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 19.86 225 |&nbsp 19.65 223
&nbsp229 Central Conn. St. AA =&nbsp 16.56&nbsp 3 8 27.95( 224) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 15.29 233 |&nbsp 17.28 227
&nbsp236 St. Francis-Pa. AA =&nbsp 8.79&nbsp 1 9 24.71( 227) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 8.47 238 |&nbsp 8.61 235
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 21 OHIO VALLEY (AA)= 42.60 42.28 ( 20) TEAMS= 9
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp135 Jacksonville St. AA =&nbsp 53.25&nbsp 8 4 46.63( 173) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 55.17 121 |&nbsp 50.77 148
&nbsp149 Eastern Kentucky AA =&nbsp 50.16&nbsp 7 5 49.08( 159) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 51.20 135 |&nbsp 48.59 161
&nbsp157 Samford AA =&nbsp 48.08&nbsp 7 4 44.34( 184) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 46.29 158 |&nbsp 49.36 157
&nbsp168 Tennessee St. AA =&nbsp 44.79&nbsp 7 5 40.63( 193) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 43.37 168 |&nbsp 45.69 167
&nbsp175 SE Missouri St. AA =&nbsp 43.60&nbsp 5 7 46.41( 175) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.76 173 |&nbsp 44.92 172
&nbsp191 Eastern Illinois AA =&nbsp 39.06&nbsp 4 8 46.83( 170) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 36.32 194 |&nbsp 41.15 188
&nbsp196 Murray St. AA =&nbsp 37.63&nbsp 4 8 45.59( 181) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 36.70 193 |&nbsp 38.05 195
&nbsp198 Tennessee Tech AA =&nbsp 36.98&nbsp 2 9 48.72( 160) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 32.40 206 |&nbsp 40.49 191
&nbsp216 Tenn.-Martin AA =&nbsp 26.94&nbsp 2 10 44.06( 187) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 26.24 215 |&nbsp 27.14 214
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 19 PATRIOT LEAGUE (AA)= 45.13 45.90 ( 19) TEAMS= 8
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 87 Colgate AA =&nbsp 65.04&nbsp 15 1 49.28( 156) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 71.40 63 |&nbsp 59.08 113
&nbsp118 Lehigh AA =&nbsp 57.39&nbsp 8 3 46.51( 174) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 56.42 117 |&nbsp 57.86 121
&nbsp139 Fordham AA =&nbsp 52.58&nbsp 9 3 45.90( 178) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 52.18 132 |&nbsp 52.48 144
&nbsp177 Lafayette AA =&nbsp 43.56&nbsp 5 6 41.95( 191) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 38.38 190 |&nbsp 47.75 164
&nbsp182 Bucknell AA =&nbsp 41.89&nbsp 6 6 43.82( 189) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.07 177 |&nbsp 42.22 182
&nbsp186 Towson AA =&nbsp 41.46&nbsp 6 6 44.11( 185) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 39.80 184 |&nbsp 42.59 178
&nbsp207 Georgetown AA =&nbsp 33.51&nbsp 4 8 39.89( 195) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 30.50 209 |&nbsp 35.77 200
&nbsp208 Holy Cross AA =&nbsp 31.76&nbsp 1 11 46.65( 171) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 25.56 218 |&nbsp 36.14 199
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 25 PIONEER (AA)= 26.64 26.30 ( 25) TEAMS= 9
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp193 San Diego AA =&nbsp 38.17&nbsp 8 2 23.43( 228) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 36.16 197 |&nbsp 39.61 193
&nbsp199 Morehead St. AA =&nbsp 36.86&nbsp 8 3 29.32( 218) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 35.74 198 |&nbsp 37.48 196
&nbsp203 Dayton AA =&nbsp 34.41&nbsp 9 2 23.41( 229) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 33.33 203 |&nbsp 34.98 202
&nbsp211 Valparaiso AA =&nbsp 30.44&nbsp 8 4 27.19( 226) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 30.03 210 |&nbsp 30.35 210
&nbsp214 Drake AA =&nbsp 27.35&nbsp 6 6 31.86( 214) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 25.71 217 |&nbsp 28.43 213
&nbsp222 Jacksonville AA =&nbsp 23.71&nbsp 5 6 27.69( 225) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 21.73 222 |&nbsp 25.06 218
&nbsp227 Davidson AA =&nbsp 17.71&nbsp 3 8 28.32( 222) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 16.93 231 |&nbsp 17.98 226
&nbsp231 Austin Peay AA =&nbsp 16.34&nbsp 4 7 28.34( 221) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 17.51 229 |&nbsp 14.37 230
&nbsp234 Butler AA =&nbsp 11.73&nbsp 2 9 28.88( 219) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 14.63 234 |&nbsp 6.52 237
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 17 SOUTHERN (AA)= 47.52 47.47 ( 17) TEAMS= 9
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp 97 Wofford AA =&nbsp 63.74&nbsp 12 2 51.05( 151) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 68.24 71 |&nbsp 59.16 112
&nbsp130 Furman AA =&nbsp 53.86&nbsp 6 5 49.26( 157) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 51.11 136 |&nbsp 56.11 129
&nbsp137 Appalachian St. AA =&nbsp 52.96&nbsp 7 4 48.64( 161) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 55.26 120 |&nbsp 50.08 153
&nbsp145 Georgia Southern AA =&nbsp 50.81&nbsp 7 4 43.74( 190) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 52.29 130 |&nbsp 48.76 159
&nbsp159 Citadel AA =&nbsp 47.53&nbsp 6 6 50.08( 153) 0 1 | 0 1 |&nbsp 49.34 144 |&nbsp 45.09 170
&nbsp163 Western Carolina AA =&nbsp 46.07&nbsp 5 7 52.44( 148) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 46.49 157 |&nbsp 45.12 169
&nbsp179 East Tennessee St. AA =&nbsp 42.30&nbsp 5 7 46.01( 177) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.32 175 |&nbsp 42.77 177
&nbsp201 Chattanooga AA =&nbsp 35.68&nbsp 3 9 48.45( 162) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 38.62 188 |&nbsp 31.53 208
&nbsp204 Elon AA =&nbsp 34.33&nbsp 2 10 47.97( 163) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 36.25 196 |&nbsp 31.56 207
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 16 SOUTHLAND (AA)= 48.72 48.89 ( 16) TEAMS= 6
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp110 McNeese St. AA =&nbsp 60.09&nbsp 10 2 50.77( 152) 0 0 | 0 1 |&nbsp 62.69 97 |&nbsp 57.08 126
&nbsp129 Stephen F. Austin AA =&nbsp 54.16&nbsp 7 4 47.92( 165) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 50.65 139 |&nbsp 57.16 125
&nbsp146 Nicholls St. AA =&nbsp 50.74&nbsp 5 6 50.02( 154) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 47.45 153 |&nbsp 53.47 139
&nbsp161 NW Louisiana AA =&nbsp 46.80&nbsp 6 6 45.25( 182) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 42.19 170 |&nbsp 50.63 149
&nbsp181 Texas State AA =&nbsp 42.08&nbsp 4 8 52.76( 146) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 39.98 182 |&nbsp 43.61 175
&nbsp188 Sam Houston St. AA =&nbsp 39.50&nbsp 2 9 54.95( 136) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 37.66 192 |&nbsp 40.79 190
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 24 SOUTHWESTERN (AA)= 32.43 31.56 ( 24) TEAMS= 10
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp153 Southern U. AA =&nbsp 49.33&nbsp 12 1 31.42( 217) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 52.92 128 |&nbsp 44.94 171
&nbsp162 Grambling AA =&nbsp 46.17&nbsp 9 3 33.07( 211) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 49.18 145 |&nbsp 42.32 181
&nbsp180 Alabama A&M AA =&nbsp 42.24&nbsp 8 4 31.58( 216) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.79 172 |&nbsp 42.20 183
&nbsp190 Alabama St. AA =&nbsp 39.12&nbsp 8 5 34.59( 209) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.03 178 |&nbsp 36.44 198
&nbsp195 Alcorn St. AA =&nbsp 37.97&nbsp 7 5 33.07( 212) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 41.24 176 |&nbsp 33.46 204
&nbsp212 Texas Southern AA =&nbsp 28.68&nbsp 5 6 33.22( 210) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 33.02 204 |&nbsp 21.62 222
&nbsp217 Jackson St. AA =&nbsp 26.12&nbsp 2 10 37.78( 199) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 25.97 216 |&nbsp 25.76 217
&nbsp221 Ark.-Pine Bluff AA =&nbsp 23.91&nbsp 4 7 31.84( 215) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 27.00 214 |&nbsp 18.99 225
&nbsp230 Miss. Valley St. AA =&nbsp 16.40&nbsp 2 9 32.86( 213) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 17.45 230 |&nbsp 14.60 229
&nbsp238 Prairie View A&M AA =&nbsp 5.70&nbsp 1 10 35.47( 205) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 10.24 235 |&nbsp -8.08 240
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 20 I-AA INDEPENDENTS (AA)= 43.40 41.82 ( 21) TEAMS= 9
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp107 Florida Atlantic AA =&nbsp 60.69&nbsp 11 3 47.93( 164) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 64.92 87 |&nbsp 56.19 127
&nbsp113 Northern Colorado AAA =&nbsp 59.35&nbsp 9 2 58.49( 122) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 60.11 109 |&nbsp 58.09 120
&nbsp123 Cal Poly-SLO AA =&nbsp 56.60&nbsp 7 4 52.65( 147) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 55.29 119 |&nbsp 57.41 124
&nbsp156 Southern Utah AA =&nbsp 48.38&nbsp 4 7 54.51( 141) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 46.25 159 |&nbsp 49.99 154
&nbsp158 UC Davis AAA =&nbsp 47.61&nbsp 6 4 46.87( 169) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 43.36 169 |&nbsp 51.16 147
&nbsp192 Fla. International AA =&nbsp 38.77&nbsp 2 10 47.90( 166) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 32.13 207 |&nbsp 43.77 173
&nbsp213 SE Louisiana AA =&nbsp 28.47&nbsp 5 7 39.12( 196) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 27.39 213 |&nbsp 29.03 212
&nbsp215 Saint Mary’s-Cal. AA =&nbsp 27.24&nbsp 1 11 49.10( 158) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 27.64 211 |&nbsp 26.27 216
&nbsp235 Savannah St. AA =&nbsp 9.25&nbsp 0 12 37.59( 200) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp 9.04 236 |&nbsp 8.95 234
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

&nbsp 28 ***UNRATED*** (**)= -96.18 -96.18 ( 28) TEAMS= 1
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 – FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45  &nbspRATING&nbsp W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 |&nbsp ELO-CHESS  |&nbsp PREDICTOR  

&nbsp241 ***UNRATED*** =&nbsp-96.18&nbsp 36 83 0.00( 0) 0 0 | 0 0 |&nbsp -96.18 241 |&nbsp -96.18 241
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Wait is there more to this story

COLLEGE FOOTBALL GAMEDAY

GameDay
GameDay
Welcome to GameDay.Blog. Powered by SportsBook-Live.com. We offer Tickets, fan Merchandise, News and RSS feeds for all your Favorite Professional sports leagues.
https://collegefootball.gameday.blog